The Three Types of Fishing Lines

Know More about Fishing Lines

Among the many fishing tools, a fishing line is one of the most important. It is the link between the angler and fish and this critical link makes the choice of a fishing line very important. The process of selecting a fishing line is not always a walk in the park as there are so many options of fishing lines in the market. Selecting a fishing line can be quite daunting if you don’t have enough information about fishing lines. Understanding the basics about fishing lines cannot be overestimated as it helps you to purchase a fishing line that has performance characteristics that perfectly fit your fishing needs. This article presents to you the three most common types of fishing lines that are available at your local tackle shop, together with their pros and cons. The more information you have about fishing lines, the more prepared you are to make your catch

Types of Fishing Lines

The types of fishing lines that are used by anglers include braid, monofilament and fluorocarbon. The different types of fishing lines come with different properties and qualities that make them fit for use in different fishing situations. Each has its own shortcomings that make it unsuitable for use in certain fishing conditions.

1. BRAID

Braid Line Source: tradekorea.com

Braided fishing line, also known as microfilament, is the oldest of all lines. As the name suggests, it is essentially strands of the material used to make it woven together to form a small diameter. The materials used to make these lines include Dyneema, Spectra and Dacron. The technology used to make these lines is very innovative

PROS

  • Have negligible stretch
  • Have incredible strength
  • Have high abrasion resistance
  • Their diameter is very small as compared to their pound test
  • Don’t absorb water meaning that they don’t change characteristics when exposed to wet conditions
  • Float perfectly well
  • Does not deteriorate when exposed to UV light
  • Does not retain memory. Here, memory refers to the ability of the line not to stay straight but rather to retain its shape even after deformation. Retaining memory results in more friction on reels and guides and this affects smooth casting

CONS

  • Some braided lines are highly visible to the fish. However, this may not be an issue in low light or heavy cover conditions
  • Some are coated and they may, therefore, their abrasion resistance may be quite dubious
  • Their color usually fades over time.
  • They cost more as compared to monofilament

2. MONOFILAMENT

Monofilament Line Source: academy.com

Source; -mrrp.tamu.edu

As the name suggests, monofilament fishing lines are the opposite of microfilament ones. It consists of a single strand of the material used to make it. The most common and popular material is nylon where in most cases, different varieties are combined to form polymers that have different degrees of strength, stretch and abrasion resistance. Though its popularity is declining as a result of innovation of microfilaments, it is still the commonly used fishing line

PROS

  • Easy and smooth casting
  • The knot strength is good enoug
  • Less expensive as compared to other lines
  • Less visible to the fish, especially the clear and blue shades
  • Comes with different colors which don’t fade easily
  • Floats well
  • The abrasion resistance is generally good

CONS

  • It absorbs water making them change their characteristics
  • It is stretchy
  • It deteriorates with time when exposed to UV light
  • Retains memory

3. FLOUROCARBON

This line is relatively new in the market and has become popular in the past decade. It has similar features to monofilament. The two differs in terms of light reflection and refraction. Its refractive index is almost the same as that of water meaning that it can bend light just like water. The material used to make this line is dense and heavy

Source: fishusa.com

PROS

  • Extremely less visible
  • It sinks because it is denser than water
  • Does not deteriorate when exposed to UV light
  • It is less stretch as compared to monofilament
  • It has an exceptional abrasion resistance
  • It does not absorb water meaning that its qualities do not change whether dry or wet
  • Its knot strength is good enough
  • It has less memory as compared to monofilament

CONS

  • Having less memory could be problematic on spinning reels
  • It appears stiffer than monofilament. The problem is worse in higher strengths
  • ​The sinking quality does not fit all fishing situations
  • It is more expensive than monofilament

Spread the love
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *